Disc Specs
- Region:
1 - Released:
23 May 2006 - Country:
United States of America - Running Time:
94 minutes - Screen Format:
1.78:1 Anamorphic NTSC - Discs / Sides / Layers:
2 / 1 / Dual - Soundtracks:
English DD5.1 - Subtitles:
English
Spanish - Special Features:
Commentary
CGI Making of the Film
Storyboards
Dinner with Uwe
Trailer
BloodRayne 2 PC Video Game - Distributor:
Uwe Boll Productions
Bloodrayne (Unrated Director's Cut)
18-06-2006 00:00 | 9637 views | Eamonn McCusker | Show Backlinks
Three strangers - Vladimir (Michael Madsen), Sebastian (Matt Davis) and Katarin (Michelle Rodriguez) - ride into a small village in search of food, drink and rest for the night. Tired from a long journey, they enjoy a glass of wine but are troubled when they are joined by one unknown to them. Seeing that this man casts no shadow in a mirror, Sebastian, without turning to him, pierces his heart with his sword whereupon he falls to the ground. Before those who've stopped to look, this corpse quickly ages and turns to dust. Life in the village quickly returns to normal, leaving us in no doubt that not only are vampires an everyday threat but that so too are vampire-slayers.
What the Vladimir, Sebastian and Katarin learn is that a circus outside of the village is holding a savage young woman who drinks the blood of animals and who appears to have supernatural powers. Believing her to be a vampire, Vladimir is wary of Rayne but seeing her wear a crucifix, he realises she is something else - part vampire and part human...a dhamphir. Escaping from the circus, Rayne begins a quest to seek out the vampire who killed her mother but, in doing so, learns that this creature, Kagan (Ben Kingsley), is the most powerful vampire in the known world. Joining with Vladimir - who is revealed to be a member of the secretive Brimstone Society - Rayne sets out to take her revenge on Kagan but betrayal and a terrible secret await her and Vladimir...

Mostly, there's little basis to the grumbling of videogames fans as regards the often terrible film adaptations of their favourite games. In spite of the grey cloud of criticism that refuses to move away from the two films sprung from Capcom's Resident Evil - due, I'm sure, to the involvement of Paul WS Anderson on both - they're both quite wonderful when compared to the shoddy live-action footage that opens the original game. For anyone who remembers the quite shocking line-up of actors that opened Resident Evil - those actors playing Wesker and Chris Redfield looked to have come straight from the adult film business - not to mention the rubber dogs that looked unconvincing even in grainy black-and-white, Anderson worked wonders in producing a film that avoided such lines as, "You were almost a Jill sandwich!" and "You...the master of unlocking!" Actually writing this down brings back the horror of it all - an unintentional horror, admittedly - leaving it difficult to connect Resident Evil with the outrage that followed the appointment of Anderson as director.
Equally, it's hard to believe that there was genuine concern over the quality of the Doom movie, itself based on a game the plot of which could have been written on the back of a beer mat in larger-than-usual handwriting. That they hired The Rock to star in this story of a teleportation-experiment-on-Mars-gone-wrong actually serves to flatter Doom more than the career of the one-time wrestler who's known to his mother as Dwayne Johnson. Duke Nukem, Baldur's Gate, Far Cry and even Tekken are all films stuck in development hell, leaving fans continuing to fret and wring their hands over quality of the finished film. In the case of Tekken, that is, in case anyone's missed that particular game, a beat-em-up based around a martial arts tournament in Japan that features, amongst other characters, a robot, a man with the head of a tiger and, in Tekken 2, a demon. Frankly, I'd have higher hopes over a videogame adaptation of Q*Bert set in the world of interior decorating.

It's fitting that the world of videogame adaptations has so drawn Uwe Boll to them, like a particularly clumsy moth to a very bright flame. In a way, they deserve one another - Boll keeping going in his chosen career taking not the slightest bit of notice of any of the criticism - whilst an equally stubborn set of fans rouse themselves on occasion to oppose him. And yet, they're unavoidably drawn to one another - Boll to videogames and gamers to Boll and I, for one, can't help but admire him, much as I do Paul WS Anderson. There is, though, a vast difference between admiring Boll for his perseverance and for his films and whilst one can enjoy how he persists with videogame adaptations, it's much more difficult to actually enjoy one of his movies.
Cheap even by the standard of some very inexpensive films - in addition to previous Uwe Boll films, I can also point you towards Beastmaster III: The Eye of Braxas as a comparison - BloodRayne is the kind of film where you find yourself thinking that Michael Paré will be along in a minute. And, as if knowing it to be a fait accompli, Boll has him wander in, playing Iancu as a kind of Q for the Brimstone Society, arming them with, amongst other items, "black powder from China." In itself, this is something of a nod towards the tendency of fantasy films to refer to something in the most oblique of terms - hence the avoidance of saying 'gunpowder' in favour of something that hints at the mystery of the Orient - but given that Paré delivers it with all the exoticism of a advertisement for Kwok-Man's Chinese Takeaway, it falls out of his mouth with such a thud that you can feel the vibrations as it lands.
It does feel slightly unfair to Paré to single him out for criticism as he's very far from being the worst actor here. Which, to anyone who's seen Paré in, well, anything, is testament to how poor the quality of the acting is. Meat Loaf Aday - or just plain old Meat Loaf to those who once wondered what he and Ellen Foley were up to during the sports commentary on Paradise By The Dashboard Light - is also in here but appears to have taken his cue from the opening minute of You Took The Words Right Out Of My Mouth on Bat Out Of Hell. Lolling about around some naked women in his playing of a vampire, one does wonder if he'll ask, "On a hot summer night, would you offer your throat to the wolf with the red rose?" Michael Madsen and Michelle Rodriguez, perhaps in an effort to stretch the film out that little bit longer, speak very, very slowly whilst Kristanna Loken did much better as the mute female Terminator than she does here, although, unlike Rodriguez, she's prepared to reveal herself - figuratively and literally - in her playing of the half-human/half-vampire that is the star of the film. Together, they are working to a standard that will be recognisable to anyone who has attended a murder mystery weekend, wherein actors seem to wander in without warning and appear to make random announcements that may, under close scrutiny, have something to do with a plot.
Speaking of which, BloodRayne is structured exactly like a videogame, which makes one wonder where much of the criticism of Boll as a director of adaptations has come from. Characters come and go - Billy Zane is in the cast but looks as though he simply excused himself during the production and never returned - Ben Kingsley...sorry, Sir Ben Kingsley is cast as a boss character and in the manner of a good many videogames, Rayne must collect three items before she can face Kagan. BloodRayne's occasional feasting on the blood of vampires is much like the first aid packs that Lara Croft tripped over or that Max Payne found in otherwise trashed toilets while her training with the Brimstone Society is akin to her leveling up. Even the gore has the feel of a videogame about it, being just too bright a splash of red.
And yet much as it delivers on the gore, BloodRayne does so in the manner of an expensive film that's been incompetently made. Where a Peter Jackson might have used porridge, ketchup and sausages for his gore or a Frank Henenlotter would have cut away from the violence such that the gore occurred offscreen, Boll has the money to put the gore onscreen but not the ability to make it look convincing. Hence, the frequent amount of cutting that goes on between a stuntman being sliced open and an entrails-filled dummy falling apart. There's a particularly terrible effect that will have you desperately looking for the wires used to pull the human model apart, not because they're actually there but because the film is so dreadful that you expect it to conform with equally dreadful effects. Yet it doesn't and in that respect, BloodRayne is very well made but because the script, acting, directing and CG effects are all so terrible, one expects everything else to be of a similarly poor quality.
And that, amongst very many things that are wrong with the film, is its main failing - BloodRayne is atrociously made but one has no sympathy for it. Unlike the manner in which I argued for Anchor Bay's Triple Creature Feature - they may well have been cheap films but, wisely, they kept the gore off the screen - I'd never make the case for BloodRayne. It's too expensively made to have be charmingly amateurish but too badly made to be any good. Not before time, audiences seem to be agreeing with Western cinemagoers beginning to turn their back on Boll and although I still maintain that videogame adaptations frequently get the filmmakers they deserve, the efforts of Uwe Boll may be a step too far even then. Unfortunately, Boll's indiscriminate dabbling in videogaming is tarring all such adaptations with the same shit-coloured brush and despite the variable quality of what we've seen to date, it's a pity that any that aspire to being very much more than a capable action movie will be thought of as yet another Boll-ism.
Transfer
Of course, you expect BloodRayne to have a very good transfer and, in that respect, it doesn't disappoint. Though dark, the amount of detail is impressive and with very little digital noise in the picture, the DVD shows off Boll's very ordinary direction such that there can be few questions as to where the blame for BloodRayne lies. It's worth noting that blacks are particularly good and, given this being a film about vampires, it does follow that this is a better-than-average release. The Dolby Digital 5.1 audio track is quite dull, however, with some use of the rear channels but not enough. Dialogue and action are both clear, albeit, given Boll's direction, sluggish, and it sounds fine but anything other than ordinary.
Extras
Commentary: Kristanna Loken, Will Sanderson, First AD Brian Knight and producer Shawn Williamson join Uwe Boll for this feature-length commentary that does a quite remarkable job of talking it up. At first, you do wonder if they're actually watching the same film but the longer it goes on, the more it becomes apparent that they are, even to the uncomfortable pause that accompanies Kristanna Loken's nude scene. Unlike the actual film, it is fast-paced (and chatty) affair and there does seem, regardless of the quality of the movie, a good-natured feel to the track.
CGI Making Of BloodRayne (5m20s): BloodRayne is not only based on a videogame but bears a similarity to the poor quality of FMV that opened last-generation Playstation games. Hard to believe, then, that the producers of this DVD think that we want to have these scenes deconstructed. Never actually showing the gently humming ranks of Commodore VIC-20s that were used in the rendering of BloodRayne, this picks out several scenes and shows how CG effects were composited on the live action footage. Played in silence - in spite of searching for an audio track for the first minute, I found none - this isn't all that interesting but is over quickly.

Dinner With Uwe (47m35s): Given the quality of the films that he produces, one expects a dinner with Uwe Boll to have a similar cheapness to it. Imagine my surprise, then, when this actually features Boll sitting at a table and not wolfing down a kebab outside of Abrakebabra on a busy Saturday night. Joined by two guests - who, whether through shyness or shame, do not reveal their names - Boll discusses his first experiments with film, that he did not study filmmaking at university (you're surprised?) and how he became attracted to genre films on seeing how much money there was to be made. Actually, this isn't at all bad as regardless what you might think of Boll's direction, he's funny and fairly frank here and talks about the various films that he's made, revealing the successes and failures in his career. There may be more of one than the other but Uwe ploughs on nonetheless with a certain, and pleasing, disregard for the feelings of others. You'd think they'd have treated him to pudding though.
Finally, this first disc ends with a set of Storyboards (5x Screens) and a Trailer (1m35s).
Bloodrayne 2 Video Game: Now we're talking! It's frankly about time that someone realised that a decent extra on a film adaptation of a videogame might be the videogame itself. After all, however much one might expect the audience for this DVD to have already played the game, that isn't always the case. At least it isn't with this viewer. So, with a second DVD containing the full version of BloodRayne 2, this release suddenly looks a good deal more appealing. One hopes, then, that future DVD releases of videogame adaptations will follow Boll's cue, perhaps prompting videogame producers to realise that, even if the game is getting on a little, it doesn't take a great deal of work to ready a game for XP. Duke Nukem Forever to tie in with the Duke Nukem movie?
Overall
Uwe Boll is clearly very proud of his film, particularly the gore - he even chooses to end BloodRayne with a short recap of the most excessive grue - so one can't help but hope that, one day, he actually manages to make a film that he should be proud of. Until then - although, beginning a sentence like that does kind of imply that it will eventually happen...which I doubt - you have a very decent release of BloodRayne with a good presentation of the film and a set of extras that borders on the very generous. It may be an awful film but I suspect that Boll's latest will somehow find its audience, at least break even and will give the good doctor grounds for preparing yet another business case. Jet Set Willy? Nintendogs? Minesweeper? We can but wait...
Sponsored Review
To ensure continued reviews of the latest multiregion titles please help support DVDTimes by purchasing your DVDs through our affiliate links around the page, including the graphic link below.
See our full list of CD-Wow Sponsored Reviews



Comments
Contributor
Posts: 1651
------
Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site
Member
Posts: 68
Grieve for the Skies
Posts: 276
------
Take my love. Take my land. Take me where I cannot stand.
I don't care, I'm still free. You can't take the sky from me.
Member
Posts: 1817
Originally Posted by Michael Mackenzie:
Nice review, Eamonn, of a truly horrifying sounding film. I should point out, however, that the DVD is cropped from its original aspect ratio of 2.35:1 to 1.78:1.
Is that definite, or is it open matte like House of the Dead and Alone in the Dark?
God, those screenshots look like Amando de Ossorio's The Ghost Galleon. Is it really that cheap?
Contributor
Posts: 228
Originally Posted by Michael Mackenzie:
Nice review, Eamonn, of a truly horrifying sounding film. I should point out, however, that the DVD is cropped from its original aspect ratio of 2.35:1 to 1.78:1.
Quite right...I'll change this now. I wasn't sure after reading the IMDB, where it was listed as 2.35:1, and clearly seeing that it wasn't on the television as the back of the box lists DTS despite the film not having such an audio option. Granted, it may be on the game but...
Originally Posted by Aretak:
The two people eating alongside Dr. Boll in the 'Dinner with Uwe' featurette are Jessica Chobot and Chris Carle, both writers for IGN Filmforce. The whole thing can be downloaded free of charge from their website.
Thanks for that. Unfortunately, Dinne with Uwe, like the CG feature, just seem to begin and end without any introduction or title screen.
Originally Posted by Phil Q:
God, those screenshots look like Amando de Ossorio's The Ghost Galleon. Is it really that cheap?
There is one spectacularly cheap effect that I would have loved to have included but it would have needed three screenshots to explain just why it is. But it's actually not that bad looking a film - Boll can stage a shot, can dress a set fairly convincingly and doesn't do a bad job of keeping things moving but pacing, structure and continuity scatter themselves like confetti at a wedding.
Banned Loser
Posts: 119
------
Member
Posts: 285
I am an agent of chaos!
Posts: 408
Originally Posted by Eamonn McCusker:
There is one spectacularly cheap effect that I would have loved to have included but it would have needed three screenshots to explain just why it is. But it's actually not that bad looking a film - Boll can stage a shot, can dress a set fairly convincingly and doesn't do a bad job of keeping things moving but pacing, structure and continuity scatter themselves like confetti at a wedding.
Come on Eamonn, you can't leave us dangling like that. Please put the three shots up otherwise I will be forced to buy it.
I might have to buy it anyway as it sounds soooo dreadful it might be worth a laugh.
The scary thing is that Boll has four others in the pipeline, one of which is already in post-production. Doesn't sound like he'll be giving up his favourite hobby just yet.
Thanks for the entertaining review Eamonn. Best one I've read for a long while.
------
http://www.intervocative.com/dvdcollection.aspx/hiram.k.hackenbacker
I am an agent of chaos!
Posts: 408
I can't wait to read the review of this one....
Jason Statham .... Farmer Daimon
John Rhys-Davies .... Merick (as John Rhys Davies)
Ray Liotta .... Gallian
Matthew Lillard .... Duke Farrow
Leelee Sobieski .... Muriella
Burt Reynolds .... King Konreid
Will Sanderson .... Bastian
Ron Perlman .... Norrick
Claire Forlani .... Solona
Brian J. White .... Tarish
Kristanna Loken .... Elora
------
http://www.intervocative.com/dvdcollection.aspx/hiram.k.hackenbacker
Rock N' Troll
Posts: 334
Member
Posts: 111
Member
Posts: 1817
Originally Posted by Takeshi357:
Would you say that Uwe Boll is bad in the Ed Wood kind of way? Or are his movies so bad that they're not even enjoyable in their badness?
Personally I think House of the Dead is so-bad-it's-good. The acting and script are dreadful but there's a long zombie battle scene which is very good fun. And it has Clint Howard and Jurgen Prochnow in it, which gets bonus points from me. Alone in the Dark is just bewildering and well, crap. Haven't seen Bloodrayne yet - but I'm looking forward to it.
Contributor
Posts: 228
First one is of two men swordfighting, one of whom, the monk, is readying himself to be struck by the other's sword:
Next up - and this is no more than three or four frames later - monk now has a giblet pack in place and is ready to start firing the pumps in it. Notice how the swordsman in the black cloak is now walking in front of the camera so as to disguise that it's moved slightly and that the angle has changed. Clever technique...but not one that works.
Swordsman has now exited the scene and the blood begins to flow...
Last shot, third angle in less than 12 frames and there's loads more blood leading to the top and bottom half of what is now a dummy falling apart.
These represent the worst aspects of how Boll can't stage the scene. Don't get me wrong, the effects are actually pretty good and if the stuntmen look a bit bored and slow. they still clash swords fairly well but however this was set up, Boll couldn't keep his camera in the one spot for the length of the effect. Maybe it needed a couple of days work but two jumps of the camera in less than a second looks, at first, as if it fell over before, under closer inspection, a really hamfisted effects shot.
And there's plenty more in the film where this came from. Not, then, so bad it's good - there's nothing as funny in this as Eros', "Stronger. You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!" in Plan 9 - but just slower and less honest-to-goodness terrible. But...the gore effects are pretty good and Boll has a nice line in sets and locations.
Member
Posts: 59
Originally Posted by Takeshi357:
Would you say that Uwe Boll is bad in the Ed Wood kind of way? Or are his movies so bad that they're not even enjoyable in their badness?
having seen Alone in the Dark, I'd would say they are just bad. He seems to have no clue has to how to tell a story...so maybe he's ok and just happens pick atrocious scripter/writers...but i doubt it.
Most fan's biggest problem with him is that because he's screwed it up once, why would anyone make a proper version.
Member
Posts: 1817
Jet Set Willy? Nintendogs? Minesweeper? We can but wait...
I've always thought Horace Goes Skiing has a lot of cinematic potential.
I am an agent of chaos!
Posts: 408
having seen Alone in the Dark, I'd would say they are just bad. He seems to have no clue has to how to tell a story...so maybe he's ok and just happens pick atrocious scripter/writers...but i doubt it.
That may well be the case. Which may explain why he has chosen to write the scripts for two of the four projects he currently has in production, Postal and Seed....Oh joy!! I can't wait.
Thanks for captures Eamonn. It must have taken some time to do and it is appreciated.
------
http://www.intervocative.com/dvdcollection.aspx/hiram.k.hackenbacker
Member
Posts: 27
That they hired The Rock to star in this story of a teleportation-experiment-on-Mars-gone-wrong actually serves to flatter Doom more than the career of the one-time wrestler who's known to his mother as Dwayne Johnson.
while i appreciate this has nothing to do with the review, tyhis is incorrect. i know you're only mentioning it to make yourself sound whitty or whatever but still, it's wrong.
Contributor
Posts: 228
Damn those sources!
I am an agent of chaos!
Posts: 408
------
http://www.intervocative.com/dvdcollection.aspx/hiram.k.hackenbacker
Quisling
Posts: 211
Contributor
Posts: 228
Paré is, for me, the making of Streets Of Fire, which is almost as ridiculously exciting a film as Smokey And The Bandit and which, like that film, is long overdue a proper SE. The bit where he takes on three goons armed with butterfly knives and teaches them a lesson - no martial arts here, just a proper open-handed slap across the chops - literally has me cheering at the screen. Heavens, he even makes a pair of leather dungarees look cool so obviously the man is blessed with something.
Not bad in The Philadelphia Experiment either but Streets Of Fire...that's a really great film! Still, he's not very good here...sorry cat!
Member
Posts: 155
it was like a throwback to the early 80s fantasy films.
cant forgive the 'my companion has dissapeared' line in the dungeons though - it was of school play quality!
Member
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by Eamonn McCusker:
Which bit? They didn't hire The Rock? Doom isn't to do with a teleportation experiment gone wrong? He's not a one-time wrestler? His mother doesn't call him Dwayne?
Damn those sources!
I think it's the "actually serves to flatter Doom more than the career of " part that irv disagrees with.
yes, but also i dont count someone being a full time professional wrestler from 1997 to 2001 and then several returning stints up to 2003 as "one-time". i don't watch or care about wrestling but you're wrong. you applied this description as a means to disparage the guy and its unnecessary. didn't see you cite any "sources" so i can't comment but wikipedia seems to disagree with you. as does a simple google search.
Contributor
Posts: 228
I'm sure The Rock can take a cheap gag in the spirit in which it was intended...cheap! But, y'know, if he really minded, he's more than capable of dealing with me himself. Whether he'd need to put on the kind of girlie pants that wrestlers seem to be rather fond of is one that I'll leave up to him.
Now, if it had been Mick 'Not the ears!' McManus, that'd have been a different matter. No way would I have messed with him...
Member
Posts: 1817
Originally Posted by irv:
yes, but also i dont count someone being a full time professional wrestler from 1997 to 2001 and then several returning stints up to 2003 as "one-time". i don't watch or care about wrestling but you're wrong.
The word "one-time" (or "onetime") in this context means "former". The Rock is a former wrestler. Describing him as a "one-time wrestler", cheap gag or not, is therefore correct. It does not imply that he ONCE (and once only) got in a wrestling ring, took on one of those mullet-headed, sunbed-loving, steroid-jockey lummoxes and decided it wasn't for him.
Page: 1, 2