Disc Specs
- Region:
1 - Released:
6th September 2005 - Country:
United States of America - Running Time:
1068 minutes - Screen Format:
1.77:1 Anamorphic NTSC - Discs / Sides / Layers:
7 / 1 / Dual - Soundtracks:
English 5.1 - Subtitles:
English HOH (main feature only) - Special Features:
Too numerous to mention here - see review text - Distributor:
Touchstone
Film Specs
- Certificate:
TV 14 - Released:
2004 - Country:
United States of America - Director:
Various - Starring:
Naveen Andrews
Emilie de Ravin
Matthew Fox
Jorge Garcia
Maggie Grace
Josh Holloway
Malcolm David Kelley
Daniel Dae Kim
Yunjin Kim
Evangeline Lilly
Dominic Monaghan
Terry O'Quinn
Harold Perrineau - Genre(s):
Adventure
Suspense
Television

Lost - Season One
12-09-2005 12:00 | 17753 views | Mark Boydell | Show Backlinks
His eyes open rapidly - no flicker of recollection and the questions fly through his mind. Where am I? What's happened? What am I doing in these shrubs? What's this in my pocket? Have I been drinking? Slowly, Jack (Fox) gets on his feet and finds his way through the undergrowth to the beach. A scene of devastation awaits him - the carcass of a plane is strewn over the beach, survivors clutch their wounded limbs as they try to help one another. Jack's medical background wakes up immediately and he throws himself into helping the injured expecting the rescue team to be there within hours. But that just doesn't happen... Days go by with no sign of anyone else but themselves. Sayid (Andrews) suggests that the cockpit should contain a transceiver but the cockpit is nowhere to be seen. Kate (Lilly), Charlie (Monaghan) and Jack volunteer to go looking for it in the forest.

ABC must be counting their lucky stars when two of their new series of 2004 topped the audience charts. Desperate Housewives took the first spot but close behind followed Lost, an unusual new series that mixed elements of The Lord of The Flies and Robinson Crusoe with the more straightforward thrills you come to expect from the likes of JJ Abrams. Starting with a large lead cast (fourteen main characters in total), the show has succeeded at skilfully making effective use of the characters lives before the crash whilst still keeping the main story of the marooned islanders trundling along at a decent speed. The storytelling is equally well assisted by the cinematography which makes great use of dolly shots and steadicam as well as natural settings giving the show a unique, organic look that sets it apart from the rest. The casting has chosen mostly quite experienced performers (O'Quinn, Perrineau, Daniel Dae Kim,Yoon-Jin Kim) with relative newcomers such as Evangeline Lilly - this helps tremendously to give the show gravitas and steadies the boat, preventing the series from becoming too much of a Friends meets Castaway.

Like all series, the quality varies a fair amount between the episodes and there is the odd moment when the characterisation is less than perfect -the first two episodes feature some of the worst character building threads of the series which may have been inevitable to get the ball rolling though they are still quite jarring in contrast to the rest of the season. Personally, I found every episode which focuses on the Korean couple, Locke or Walt and Michael to be the best. Conversely, I find the bizarrely popular Charlie strand to be the weaker episodes despite a good performance from Monaghan as a washed out rockstar. Still at the end of the day, Lost is the type of show that may not be as good as my benchmark, Twin Peaks, but comes very close to it. There are occasional lapses of good taste such as the use of Jack and Kate's bonding story in the Pilot but, crucially, I'm happy to suspend disbelief and just go with it. That is what makes it special and means we'll be seeing more than a few seasons of Lost. The key issue from here on for the producers is to give Lost as long a shelf-life as they possibly can which can often work against overall quality - let's hope they have the decency to call it day when they should and not spoil it by dragging out à la West Wing...
The DVD:
The set comes in a Twin Peaks style presentation - a plastic sleeve slides off to open a gatefold system with two discs lodged in each section.

The image:
Very nice indeed - there are some minor issues with the blacks being slightly patchy but globally this is a vivid transfer with a sharp image. I actually found it maybe a little too rich on the colour front but it seems to be very similar to the C4 broadcast. All episodes are anamorphically transferred though most of the extras are full-frame.
The sound:
The 5.1 mix is good with a fine use of surrounds for atmospherics but doesn't really add much to what I heard when transmitted beyond a better frequency spectrum and better basses. Still a good soundtrack but very much a TV show soundtrack not a cinema one.

The extras:
Ouch! There's a lot of these and there's also some Easter Eggs hidden here and there such as an alternative show opening (it's hideous I promise you). Here's the breakdown of all the extras I found:
Disc 1:
Audio Commentaries on Pilot (parts 1 and 2) and Walkabout:
Pilot 1 & 2 - JJ Abrams, Damon Lindelhof and Brian Burk talk through the making of the pilot pointing out mistakes (such as Jack's amazingly clean shirt) as well as all the problems pitching the show at the right level (a too gruesome crash could have lost too many viewers to make the series viable) and the usual topics of writing, directing and Matthew Fox's tattoos. They're pretty honest with a lot of the absurdity of the show ("this was a plane full of the most beautiful people ever") and manage to keep on talking throughout most of the two episodes. They tend to avoid spoilers but it's probably best watching the series before watching this. They also reveal one of their ideas on how to end the pilot if the series wasn't picked which is without doubt one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
Walkabout - Director Jack Bender, writer David Fury and actor Terry O'Quinn (John Locke) comment on the episode. O'Quinn is not in the same location as Fury and Bender so it means their interaction is a little strange. It's a lot drier than the previous one and mostly sees them describing what's on the screen with quite a lot of silence as they just end up watching the episode (which is by far one of my favourites).
Lost Scripts Scanner: DVD-ROM feature (Windows only) which allows you to read the full scripts for the first two episodes in parallel with the episode.

Disc 2:
Commentary on the Moth with Burk, Lindelof and Dominic Monaghan (Charlie). Monaghan works really well on the commentary taking the mickey out of a lot of the episode ("Oh no! Droogs in my family! What am I going to do!") but the rest seem to be running out of interesting things to say
Disc 4:
The final commentary is on the Hearts and Minds episode with both the co-writers of the episode (Carlton Cruse and Javier Grillo-Marxuach) as well as the two main stars of that episode, Maggie Grace and Ian Sommerhalder. Again the two actors are phoning in their commentary so it means the interaction happens between both pairs but not much crossing over. The co-writers do the vast bulk of the talking which makes sense but sidelines the actors for a lot of the episode.

Disc 7: The extras Disc
Most of the extras find themselves onto this disc subdivided into three sections:
- Departure
- Tales from the Island
- Lost Revealed.
Departure contains the following:
- The Genesis of Lost (9 mins) takes us through how the show came to be and how Abrams became involved. Interviewing most of the main people behind it, it's relatively interesting without being fascinating.
- Designing a Disaster (8 mins): How the plane from the pilot was dismantled and used.
- Before they were lost (23 mins): Cast and directors talk about their roles and how the casting changed the characters based on the actors as well as the near misses such as Evangeline Lilly almost not making the show due to visa complications. The audition tapes are interlaced into this feature but some more are available for each character in a separate section (24 minutes) - you'll also discover how almost every single male actor was tested for the Sawyer character.
- Welcome to Oahu (34 mins): follows the making of the pilot behind the scenes with interviews with the actors and crew on set.
- The Art of Matthew Fox (7 mins): photography by Fox put to music and with him commenting on it. He's got a good knack for photography so it's worthwhile looking at.
- Lost@comicon (2 mins): The cast appear at a the comicon festival before the series was aired on TV and Monaghan and Lilly recall the events.

The following section Tales from the Island is less plentiful with three extras in it:
- Lost on Location: a series of behind the scenes films on eight different episodes. They all last between 5 and 10 minutes and are interesting enough but really bordering on fan interest more than genuine interest.
- On set with Jimmy Kimmel: A painfully unfunny host travels to the set and gets the cast involved in his sketches. It's embarrassing all round for the 8 minutes it runs for.
- Backstage with Driveshaft (7 mins): The making of the song that made Charlie famous.
Finally, comes Lost Revealed which contains the best extras:
- Two short airport flashback scenes that didn't make the cut: both very good but neither were crucial to the episode so probably were cut.
- Deleted scenes: A whole slew of them (13 in total for 15 minutes of running time) - some need redubbing and the image quality of all of them is not on par with the rest of the series but they are all interesting though tellingly none reveal anything we didn't already know from the series.
- Blooper reel: Five minute of bloopers - enough said.
- Live from the Museum of TV and radio (11 mins): an excerpt of a Q&A session with the cast and crew which is relatively entertaining especially hearing Naveen Andrews original accent and some pretty weird questions are being asked.

Conclusions:
Given that the R2 release is going to be staggered in two parts, it makes no sense not buying this version - you get the full series for what you'll have to pay for the first part of the series in the UK. The extras are maybe a little too numerous but a lot are very good and worthwhile watching - fans of course will be delighted to see the series getting this kind of treatment with little missing from it. Lost is an excellent series which has been given a deservedly good DVD release.




Comments
Member
Posts: 3
Member
Posts: 472
Part-Time Vagabond
Posts: 62
I feel exactly the same Dodd. It's not the groundbreaking - thus far - television that a lot of US viewers and critics had made out. I find myself intrigued by the mystery of the island and what lurks within, but the characters and the way they are presented are a bit of a turn-off.
*SPOILERS****************
I don't know about others, but I find myself switching off when an inevitable flashback enters the fray. The flashback can at times be a very lazy device and in Lost it pops up all too frequently. At this early stage - perhaps understandably - the island has been somewhat marginalised by the excessive character profiles that give us very 2 dimensional insights into these people. The real mystery for me is the island, not the gimmicky characters or how their particular gimmick is revealed – Locke couldn't walk, The Korean lady learnt English to escape her husband’s violent life (etc). I hope that the structure of the episodes changes later on down the trail.
I can’t imagine wanting to sit through the whole series for a repeat viewing, but I’m going to stick with Lost and see if it delivers what I’m looking for, or if I’m simply watching the wrong show.
Quisling
Posts: 211
Administrator
Posts: 413
In my view, the 'island' side of the story is secondary to what Lost is really about. I look at it as a plot device to give us the opportunity to see how these people ended up on the island and who they were before they boarded flight 815. All of these people have changed hugely as a result of their predicament, but without knowing their back stories it's hard to understand their motivations.
It's clear that Locke is blinded by faith after regaining the ability to walk - and without knowing about his past and the fact he was in a wheelchair we'd know absolutely nothing about his character. Likewise, Jack is very practical but is obviously deeply scarred by his past and his relationship with his now dead father - again without this back story his 'island' persona is very much a two dimensional characture.
Anyone who feels the character backgrounds and flashbacks are misplaced probably won't get much from Lost as the series progresses.
------
Colin Polonowski, Editor
All My Reviews | My Film Journal | CD Times
Member
Posts: 1817
Anyone who feels the character backgrounds and flashbacks are misplaced probably won't get much from Lost as the series progresses.
That'll be me then. It bores me to tears. After four and a half episodes I'd had enough of the flashbacks and irritating red herrings that will probably never be explained (because let's face it, they're making it up as they go along).
This seems to be the curse of almost all modern TV drama series - they've become soaps. They're all about the characters' personal lives and relationships. The actual plot and setting (hospital, police station, er... monster island) has been relegated to nothing more than background. Apparently it's what the public wants though...
Member
Posts: 472
A shame that the finite-drama seems to be so frowned upon these days – didn’t drama used to have beginnings, middles and ends rather than cracking beginnings, interminable, never-ending middles and nothing else?
Contributor
Posts: 136
A shame that the finite-drama seems to be so frowned upon these days – didn’t drama used to have beginnings, middles and ends rather than cracking beginnings, interminable, never-ending middles and nothing else?
So you're not a fan of Twin Peaks I assume?
Contributor
Posts: 1651
------
Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site
Member
Posts: 336
Not that it matters as such but if fans want every scrap of Lost extras...!
Member
Posts: 472
This is my problem: the need for the television studios to cling desperately to their audiences for as long as possible rather than be interested in a good story, well told. A naive problem: it's all down to business, undoubtedly, but it’s a shame that so many good series outstay their welcome.
I know this concern is both premature and pessimistic, the series should be enjoyed as it is and of the moment - a desert island may well be the ideal location for an episode in which Doctor Jack jumps a shark, but I know we shouldn't look forward to such a scene at the expense of everything else. I should reiterate that these thoughts only came about because J.J. Abrams has already claimed that he has eight seasons worth of plots to go through and given that I'm not really convinced I'll be able to last the duration, I sort of wonder why I should bother watching it at all. I'd love to be proved wrong - and I may well be, but I can't help feeling that life's too short to hang around and find out.
Pretty cast though.
Member
Posts: 16
Tell Mike Mau-Mau
Posts: 83
all the great ideas, the invisible robot dinosaur, the rampaging "something in the woods" theme, they were all thrown away. instead we get to sit down through 15+ hours of pure tedium. telling the story through flashbacks is one of the laziest and most tiresome of tv constructs and it's no different here. who cares what they did before the island? if this island is supposed to be the big amazing thing that it is, why are we spending upwards of 60 - 70% of the episode takling about some piano playing doctor and his perfectly blonde wife in their attempts to get a threesome?
here in ireland we got the show early this year and it's been amusing to see the gradual but steady decline in viewers. from a really brilliant opening set piece the show just fell away, and so did the viewers.
personally, i think it's the gaping plot holes and just plain ridiculousness of the whole thing. that woman flying at 8 or 9 months pregnant (sorry honey, your child is brain damaged). the fact they all have perfect make-up STILL! that something big and scary killed the pilot but no-one cares anymore. i could go on, but i won't.
now i have heard one brilliant theory about what the whole thing is and it certainly fills in all the gaps and makes the show watchable, but unfortunately i don't know how to do spoiler boxes :( and while it's a good theory i think, as another reviewer mentioned, they are just making it up as they go along... which in my humble opinion, is bang on the money.
to me, this show seems very lazy and boring but i guess 1,000,000 americans can't be wrong!
------
They put me in a box with my coat on!
Oh I know it don't sound like much when you say it out loud...
Part-Time Vagabond
Posts: 62
Eloquently put Anephric, but I find myself less and less interested by the contrived fashion in which these flashbacks resonate with the actions of the survivors on the island. For me, the creators have really missed a trick by pushing the island into the background – during the early stages of season 1 at least.
“It's clear that Locke is blinded by faith after regaining the ability to walk - and without knowing about his past and the fact he was in a wheelchair we'd know absolutely nothing about his character.”
Colin, I admit that Locke is intriguing, but this is as much down to Terry O’Quinn’s playing of the character as anything else (kudos to Terry – great actor).
“Likewise, Jack is very practical but is obviously deeply scarred by his past and his relationship with his now dead father - again without this back story his 'island' persona is very much a two dimensional characture.”
The characters need not be 2-dimensional without the aid of flashbacks, but this seems to be the trap that the series has fallen it to… good writing and strong dialogue could easily negate the need for such devices. However, this is the route that the creators have taken and it seems to work for as many people as it doesn’t.
I’d just like to take this opportunity to say that the odd flashback here and there never did anyone any harm! I’m not into flashbackism or anything!
Contributor
Posts: 136
So does this DVD set not include the "new extended, uncut version of the pilot episode" that all the retail websites are advertising?
I didn't notice anything more in it compared with the original one - do you know what scenes were added? It's not advertised on the packaging anyway
Contributor
Posts: 152
*SPOILER*
Wasn't it the shot of the dead pilot in the tree? I believe there was a much-more grisly shot of him.
As for the show, utter tripe, but it's wonderfully entertaining!
:D
Good review Mark.
------
Scruffy little nerf herder, and full-time film buff
@ the IMDb
Contributor
Posts: 136
This is what's on the DVD : Uncut?
The commentary makes no mention of the cut but do talk about having to tone down the gore earlier on in the episode.
Member
Posts: 16
Member
Posts: 39
Member
Posts: 1817
The show is what it is, I'm not asking them to change it. But it doesn't interest me, and that's why I no longer watch it.
Wanker of the 1st Degree
Posts: 210
Contributor
Posts: 136
Part-Time Vagabond
Posts: 62
I fully understand "the point"
All I am trying to convey is my disappointment with the direction the show has taken. That’s my privilege as a DVD Times member.
Member
Posts: 472
My box set of this turned up yesterday and I plugged a few episodes in (including the pilot, which Channel 4 butchered completely – cheerfully gory in it’s uncut form), as I suspected, the series is much more palatable when you don’t have to wait a week between episodes and suffer the endless ad breaks and 118 sponsorship spots – distractions which really screw up the pacing of the show, making the flashbacks jar more than they should. Before long, I had ploughed through a disk worth of new episodes and was gratifyingly addicted. Further proof that DVD really is the best way to watch TV these days, but then we knew that already, right?
Member
Posts: 24
Page: 1, 2