Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    R
  • Running Time:
    94 minutes
  • Released:
    2003
  • Country:

  • Director:
    Eli Roth
  • Starring:
    Rider Strong
    Jordan Ladd
    Joey Kern
    Cerina Vincent
    James DeBello
    Arie Verveen
  • Genre(s):

Cabin Fever

29-09-2003 01:00 | 8840 views  |  Tiffany Bradford  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "Cabin Fever" Content

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, because I had high hopes for this film, but...

It sounded good on paper - a timely horrific virus, an isolated cabin, college kids on Holiday, always-entertaining rednecks and the directorial talents of a David Lynch protége - I mean this is what horror Blockbusters are made of, but what sounds good on paper doesn't always translate well into film.

title or description


Cabin Fever is the story of five college graduates, Paul (Rider Strong), Karen (Jordan Ladd), Jeff (Joey Kern), Marcy (Cerina Vincent) and Bert (James DeBello), on Holiday at an isolated cabin celebrating the end of school and their last bit of freedom before becoming working members of society. The first night there, they encounter a bleeding virus-ravaged hermit (Arie Verveen) and after 'accidentally' setting him on fire, one of their group becomes infected with the same flesh-eating virus, leaving the rest of them to battle time and each other to survive.

title or description


Influenced by Peter Jackson films Dead Alive, Bad Taste and Meet the Feebles, David Lynch protége Eli Roth made his directorial debut with this homage to some of his favourite horror films. It is a disquieting mix of bizarre humour, gore and paranoia all centered around an unexplained flesh-eating virus with strong influences from The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Night of the Living Dead and Evil Dead. Roth says "The film is about the destruction of friendships and the body is a metaphor for their deterioration." His use of humour in the film is intentional and designed as a safety valve for some of the more horrific scenes, and believe me there are many. Peter Jackson was so taken with the story, he shut down production on the third installment of the Lord of the Rings to allow his cast and crew to watch a screener of the film and he also provided glowing quotes for the film's TV spots (something he had never done before for any other film). But Roth's decision to inject his bizarre humour into an otherwise clever story was fatal - it's distracting, confusing and takes the viewer out of the film.

title or description


Cabin Fever was shot in North Carolina on a small budget giving some of the locals an opportunity for their fifteen minutes of fame. Composers Angelo Badalamenti and Nathan Barr were brought on board to score the film for Roth who was aiming for a 70's-like sound, but with appropriate scariness. Roth even approached the king of sleaze himself, David Hess (Last House on the Left), for permission to use several of his songs from that film in Cabin Fever. Shot in wide screen by Cinematographer Scott Kevan, the film manages to capture the 70's/80's look Roth wanted without the low-budget feel to it, but the true star of the film is the special effects and make-up. Garrett Immel, on loan from K.N.B. (the people responsible for the make-up and spfx for Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness) does a superb job transforming attractive young people into bleeding rotting towers of flesh. Those attractive young people give solid performances in spite of the uneven script, with the standouts for me being Rider Strong (Boy Meets World) and James DeBello (Scary Movie 2), but any number of attractive semi-known actors could have played their parts.

title or description


Despite praise from the likes of Peter Jackson and Stephen King, an enthusiastic reception at the 2002 Toronto Film Festival and a smattering of postive reviews, the film doesn't live up to its hype. It is genre-confusing for the average moviegoer who doesn't know the sick and twisted humour is intentional, it's disjointed, and the ending will almost certainly elicit a WTF? from every member of the audience. The gore factor is high, but unless that is all you require in a horror film, it isn't enough to insure a successful film. It's a fantastic story and if they had just played it straight, it could have been a fantastic film.

title or description



The UK release date is October 10th.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Overall: 
    7
    7 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Overall: 
    7

Comments

#1 Posted: 30-09-2003 07:10
AntonyW
Member
Posts: 111

Report this post
Can this be the same person who was defending House of 1000 Corpses as a black comedy??? ;)
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 30-09-2003 10:48
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
"Can this be the same person who was defending House of 1000 Corpses as a black comedy???"

Yep. You have a good memory AntonyW :D

I can appreciate humour in horror films, be it black comedies, hardcore with funny moments, or even cheesy 'B' movies with unintentional humour, but this film is a mess. Roth tried for and failed to replicate Peter Jackson's winning combination of horror, gore and humour. If you do see it, I would be interested to know what you think, though I have a feeling we will be two-for-two on disagreeing :)
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 01-10-2003 07:09
AntonyW
Member
Posts: 111

Report this post
I'm still looking forward to seeing it and I'll let you know if we disagree. (It's a 1-1 draw at the moment - we both enjoyed Wrong Turn!)
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 11-10-2003 17:31
99er
Account Disabled
Posts: 141

Report this post
'praise from the likes of Peter Jackson and Stephen King, an enthusiastic reception at the 2002 Toronto Film Festival and a smattering of postive reviews'

I have heard alot of negative things about this. Why then all the rave reviews by the likes of King?

Makes no sense.
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 13-10-2003 07:38
AntonyW
Member
Posts: 111

Report this post
Having now seen it, I agree it's a huge failure. I was actually enjoying it up to the point where the comedy cop wandered in from a completely different film, at which point it become one long series of incredibly tedious unfunny jokes. There's a sense of Eli Roth in the background patting himself on the back at what a clever little film he's made, but unfortunately he hasn't. Most of the effects are also pretty poor apart from the one shown above, and the film's low budget is painfully apparent.
The future of horror? I hope not. My hopes now rest on the Texas Chainsaw remake (which is getting a lot of positive whispering).:(
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 13-10-2003 11:49
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
Quote:
" My hopes now rest on the Texas Chainsaw remake"


As blasphemous as it sounds, I am already a fan of the remake, just because it isn't the original :D

We are five hours behind you guys, but I will be first in line at the Cinema to see it when it opens here - the soundtrack sounds like it's going to be good too :)
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 13-10-2003 19:42
AntonyW
Member
Posts: 111

Report this post
I hope that was said with tongue firmly in cheek!! Or are Get Carter, Planet of the Apes & The Getaway on your favourites list?;)
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 13-10-2003 21:36
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
Ummm... My tongue is nowhere near my cheek :p

I do agree the three films you mentioned are total crap though - I have been raked over the coals for not liking the original TCM, but I just don't see what all the fuss is about :confused: :)


------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 14-10-2003 07:12
AntonyW
Member
Posts: 111

Report this post
We'll be seeing your review soon, hopefully?
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 15-10-2003 00:37
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
Quote:
We'll be seeing your review soon, hopefully?


I think Kevin is reviewing it, I'm not sure.

Just a quick heads up on another horror film: I just came back from seeing The House of the Dead... OMG It is SO bad :eek: :D
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#11 Posted: 15-10-2003 07:08
AntonyW
Member
Posts: 111

Report this post
As in SO bad it's unintentionally hilarious or it just stinks?
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 15-10-2003 12:01
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
Both, but mostly the latter. It doesn't even qualify for so bad it's good status - and to add insult to injury, they hint at a sequel :(

I can't find a UK release date for you guys... but maybe that's a good thing :p
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 26-10-2003 22:12
choirboy
Member
Posts: 5

Report this post
I pretty much agree with Tiffany here.
I saw the film and was left pretty shell shocked as to why the film has had any praise heaped upon it whatsoever.
I'm pretty generous in my appreciation of horror films because I have loved them all my life but I simply thought this was awful :-(

I think the main problem lies (for me at least) with the fact that diseases in themselves are not THAT scary as a concept UNLESS they alter peoples behavioural patterns.
The disease within CABIN FEVER never creates any real dynamic threat for the audience and so the film lacks a central core, something that the we can be frightened of.

What we see here is merely some characters trying to avoid infection and the resulting distrust that ensues.
Unfortunately because the characters are protrayed as a bunch of arrogant, intellectually stunted college kids we have little reason to care if any of them survive or not.
Adding to these problems is the director's willingness to sabotage any tension that may bubble to the surface by adding for the most part an awkward quirkiness to the film.
The comedic moments feel forced and contrived on the whole except (and no one has mentioned this) a wonderfully surreal scene where a boy shouts 'pancakes!'
Something else happens but I don't want to say anymore needless to say it was an inspired moment of insanity.
This was actually the only scene I enjoyed in the movie which is the most overrated horror film for me since THE OTHERS.
Save your money is my advice.
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 27-10-2003 19:45
Moggy
Member
Posts: 2

Report this post
Hmmmm. This is a pretty poor film. Its a bit like a film student project where the writers have borrowed wholesale from a number of other films (not a crime in itself) but forgot to weave the bits together. Its almost like a series of weak sketches ( oooh this ones horror! This ones slapstick! This ones surreal!) none of which hold your attention.
The humour doesnt work and sits uneasily with the horror. The characters do not seem in control of what they are doing as they are shunted artificially from one set up to another - never acting like you'd expect of someone in the same situation.
This film is a mess - you really do come out of the cinema thinking you could do better with half its miniscule budget.
Horror film on a budget ? Dog Soldiers.

:o
Quote this post
#15 Posted: 22-03-2004 17:38
Just Call Me Wanda
Contributor
Posts: 62

Report this post
What a poor horror film! To say Eli Roth loves the genre and gleefully lays down a homage here, there and everywhere, he could have at least made something that was just a bit scary or shocking. It isn't that the ending leaves a 'wtf was that all about feeling', more a 'why-tf I'd wasted my time with this trash', in that the ending is one of the biggest let downs I've seen in a while.
------
Dan Stephens - http://www.top10films.co.uk
Quote this post
#16 Posted: 22-03-2004 18:14
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
I tried to warn you Daniel... you really should listen to me *shakes head sadly*

BTW I saw Dawn of the Dead on Friday - it totally kicks ass - please listen to me this time - miss you :D
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post