Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    NR
  • Running Time:
    98 minutes
  • Released:
    2004
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Morgan Spurlock
  • Starring:
    Morgan Spurlock
    Dr. Daryl Isaacs, M.D.
    Dr. Lisa Ganjhu, D.O.
    Dr. Stephen Siegel, M.D.
    Don Gorske
    Ronald McDonald
  • Genre(s):
    Documentary

Super Size Me

13-06-2004 05:20 | 11610 views  |  Tiffany Bradford  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "Super Size Me" Content

Imagine having to eat all of your daily meals at a McDonald's restaurant for thirty days, ordering everything on their menu at least once and having it super sized if the cashier asks you. Would you do it? Morgan Spurlock did, to illustrate the damaging effects fast foods have on our bodies and it damn near killed him.



Combining reality show gimmickry with a legitimate public service announcement, Super Size Me is Morgan Spurlock's hilarious and thought-provoking indictment of the fast food industry and their role in America's staggering obesity epidemic. Spurlock came up with the idea on Thanksgiving 2002 while watching a news programme about two teenage girls who were suing McDonald's for their obesity (the second leading cause of preventable death behind smoking). The girls had to prove that McDonald's intention was for them to eat all their meals there and that eating those meals was detrimental to their health. Intrigued, Spurlock wanted to see firsthand what would happen to his own health if he ate exclusively at McDonald's for a month.



After enlisting the services of three medical consultants and a nutritionist and over the objections of his vegan-chef girlfriend, he commences with his experiment. He undergoes an initial physical and is told he's in excellent health. Given the green light, he begins his Mcbinge averaging 5000 calories a day. By the end of the first week he has gained ten pounds and his body fat has increased by 5 percent. Day twelve sees a 17 pound weight gain and by the end of the month his grand total weight increase is 25 pounds. Over the course of thirty days, his cholesterol jumps from 165 to 225, he suffers from heart palpitations, headaches, mood swings, nausea, sexual dysfunction and one of his more aggressive and disapproving doctors tells him his liver has turned into pâté. He is asked to stop repeatedly by his medical advisors and girlfriend who are worried about his rapidly deteriorating health, but he shrugs off their concerns, grabs a double quarter pounder with cheese and sees it through to its gluttonous end.



Super Size Me is an entertaining mix of man-on-the-street interviews, alarming obesity statistics and facts, visits to McDonald's restaurants and schools across 20 US cities, a lot of disturbing images of morbidly overweight Americans, health check-ups and stern warnings from his medical team and Spurlock's own observations, all centered around the experiment. Nothing is left out of the film, not even a revolting shot of him vomiting out of the car window after he's just eaten a super sized meal or his girlfriend's complaints about his burger-induced impotency, and things get up close and personal when we are treated to his pre-experiment rectal exam. In Wisconsin he meets Don Gorske who proudly claims to have eaten 19,000 Big Macs (2 a day for 26 years) with no apparent ill effects. When he shows a group of first graders pictures of Jesus, George Washington and Ronald McDonald, Ronald McDonald is the only one they can identify. He interviews students about their lunchtime eating habits and discusses meals with a cafeteria worker who says her main tool in the preparation of Federally-funded lunchtime meals is a box cutter, since most of it comes prepackaged and his disgusted vegan girlfriend compares ham to heroin.



Winner of the Director's Award at this year's Sundance Film Festival, Super Size Me is outrageously funny and clever. The film owes a lot of its success to Spurlock himself - possessed of a charming demeanor and slightly twisted wit, he goes about his gorgefest with a sense of purpose and good humour. The film doesn't tell us anything we don't already know, but its cinematic repackaging with fun animation, great music (Queen's Fat Bottomed Girls, Curtis Mayfield's Pusher Man, the Violent Femmes Fat and Wesley Willis' Rock and Roll McDonald's) and an interesting cast of characters makes its message more palatable and entertaining. Does McDonald's and the fast food industry share some of the blame? Yes, especially when they target toddlers barely out of diapers with cool toys, colourful playgrounds and special kiddie meals, but where does corporate responsibility end and personal responsibility begin? Two months after the film won at Sundance, McDonald's announced it was doing away with super sizing and denied it was influenced by the backlash from the film - whatever the case, it was a step in the right direction... or so it seemed. I've only been to a McDonald's once since I saw the film, and only then to order their fries, but I did ask for them to be super sized and they happily obliged.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Overall: 
    9
    9 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Overall: 
    9

Comments

#1 Posted: 13-06-2004 13:46
Colin Polonowski
Administrator
Posts: 413

Report this post
Great review Tiff. Reminded me a little of some of the stuff in Fast Food Nation.
------

Colin Polonowski, Editor
All My Reviews | My Film Journal | CD Times

Quote this post
#2 Posted: 13-06-2004 14:07
Gibb
Member
Posts: 28

Report this post
Great review, Tiffany!

However, these reality documentaries are starting to disturb me slightly. very like Michale More, this guy seems to start with a premise, and aggressively persues it through to the end, desperate to prove his point of view......

However, no-one can deny that it makes good cinema, and has a certain amount of power.

Does it mention other fast food outlets (Burger King, Wendys, hardees etc), or is it more anti McDonalds?
Quote this post
#3 Posted: 13-06-2004 14:24
Richard Booth
Contributor & Filmmaker
Posts: 980

Report this post
Although I do tend to enjoy the odd trip to McDonald's (say once every couple of months), documentaries like this really put things into perspective. How they target young children is sickening, and even if it is also about self-willpower, McDonald's and the other fast-food chains should really act more responsibly.

Great review Tiff; I look forward to seeing this for myself. Perhaps Spurlock's next project could be smoking 200-a-day for a month and analysing the effects on his lungs? ;)
------
We do not tell time, time only tells us.
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 13-06-2004 14:47
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
"Does it mention other fast food outlets (Burger King, Wendys, hardees etc), or is it more anti McDonalds?"

He decided to focus on McDonald's because it represents 43% of the total U.S. fast food market and because they are so visible worldwide. And yes he mentions Wendy's and some of the other fast food franchises.

Thanks for the comments guys.
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 13-06-2004 16:00
ryonhill
Member
Posts: 118

Report this post
Anyone know when/if it will be out in the uk?
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 13-06-2004 18:16
Mike_Sunda
Contributor
Posts: 84

Report this post
I also thought of Fast Food Nation when I read the title. Hope it gets a UK release.
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 13-06-2004 19:30
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
"Anyone know when/if it will be out in the uk?"

24 September
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#8 Posted: 13-06-2004 21:25
ryonhill
Member
Posts: 118

Report this post
Cheers! ;)
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 14-06-2004 12:06
darkman
Member
Posts: 110

Report this post
First thought : Gotta see this movie.
Second thought : if it's bad for you, don't eat it all the time. Get some frikkin sense. Eating chocolate constantly would be bad too, so sue the swiss and the belgians too ? You gotta love the out-of-control american sue-em mentality :D
Quote this post
#10 Posted: 14-06-2004 14:42
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
Definitely going to see this myself if I get a chance.

It's an interesting dilemma: who, at the end of the day, is responsible - the consumer or the supplier? I would tend to say the consumer, since at the end of the day it's a business and the primary (or only) objective of the supplier is to sell their product. There's definitely something unscrupulous about a supplier that explicitly preys on children, but as Darkman said, there's an excessive "let's sue everyone" mentality in society right now (especially America) where parents do everything they can to avoid responsibility for their children. I mean, when all said and done, what kind of parent lets their child eat at McDonalds every day?

I'm a Burger King man myself, anyway. :D
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#11 Posted: 14-06-2004 15:49
Hernster
Big Member
Posts: 32

Report this post
Great Review Tiffany. :D
Quote this post
#12 Posted: 14-06-2004 17:16
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
"It's an interesting dilemma: who, at the end of the day, is responsible - the consumer or the supplier? I would tend to say the consumer, since at the end of the day it's a business and the primary (or only) objective of the supplier is to sell their product."

I totally agree with you, but the lawsuits try to say the fast food industry cultivates an addiction to salt and sugar with their foods which will keep us coming back for more.

It's down to personal responsibility - no one forces us to eat fast food and especially to have it fat-ass sized.

"I'm a Burger King man myself, anyway."

Their fries suck, but the whoppers are awesome :p
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 14-06-2004 20:03
Gibb
Member
Posts: 28

Report this post
having re-read your (excellent) review Tiffany, I find myself even more worried about this kind of movie.

I didn't pick up on the fact that he ate everything on the menu three times a day. I mean, that is just not realistic. Make a balanced, REALISTIC critique of a company if you will. Hell, eat three burgers a day. but EVERYTHING on the menu????

No wonder he was ill. If I was mcDonalds, I would be furious.
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 14-06-2004 20:35
Phil Q
Member
Posts: 1817

Report this post
Quote:
It's down to personal responsibility - no one forces us to eat fast food and especially to have it fat-ass sized.


I agree in principle, and I certainly have little sympathy for the kids suing McDonald's over their obesity. But when you read about the history of supersizing the industry really does have to take some of the blame. They realised that customers were prepared to pay a little more for bigger portions, but the actual costs to the supplier of those bigger portions were next to nothing (most of the costs are sunk into wages and premises - completely unaffected by portion sizes!). Bingo! Every time you make the portions bigger, the profit margins increase.

The result is that even the regular-sized portions have got bigger. In 1960 a portion of fries was 200 calories, now it's 610. A "meal" has increased from about 600 to 1,500 calories (according to the book Fat Land, by Greg Critser).

Of course we still have the choice of avoiding fast food altogether, but if you actually go into McDonald's (or wherever) it's tough to have a small portion even if you want one.

Morgan Spurlock's project was unrealistic and mostly for entertainment, but underneath it all there's a serious point to be made.
Quote this post
#15 Posted: 15-06-2004 01:27
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
" If I was mcDonalds, I would be furious."

Oh, they are :D

They tried to discredit Spurlock and the film, but it didn't work.

"They realised that customers were prepared to pay a little more for bigger portions"

Unfortunately a large portion of those customers willing to pay for the super sizing are low income families who received less food (but needed it more) when the super sizing was discontinued.

"the book Fat Land, by Greg Critser"

An excellent book and recommended reading along with the aforementioned Fast Food Nation.
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#16 Posted: 15-06-2004 13:05
Gavin Kagan
Member
Posts: 40

Report this post
I heard a lot about this movie when I was in Canada last month, and like Gibb I didn't realise he ordered EVERYTHING off the menu at each mealtime.

That's not particularly scientific - surely just a burger, fries and a drink each time would make more sense?

It's kind of put me off seeing this actually because anyone who eats that much of anything in a single sitting deserves everything they get! :(
------
"Oh God, Mulder, it smells like...I think its bile."
"How can I get it off my fingers without betraying my cool exterior?"
Quote this post
#17 Posted: 15-06-2004 13:16
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
"I didn't realise he ordered EVERYTHING off the menu at each mealtime."

Sorry if I wasn't clear about that - he could order anything he wanted, but he had to order everything from the menu, at least once throughout the 30 days, not for each meal.
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#18 Posted: 15-06-2004 20:41
Gibb
Member
Posts: 28

Report this post
Ahhhh, I see!

A little more scientific, then......

But not by much. Certainly not what the children I teach would call a "fair test"
Quote this post
#19 Posted: 16-06-2004 13:45
Gavin Kagan
Member
Posts: 40

Report this post
OK, now I want to see it again!

Thanks for clearing that up - blimey, he would've been a right bloater if he had eaten everything off the menu at each mealtime! :eek:
------
"Oh God, Mulder, it smells like...I think its bile."
"How can I get it off my fingers without betraying my cool exterior?"
Quote this post
#20 Posted: 19-06-2004 23:24
Downfall
Simply Irresistible
Posts: 185

Report this post
I always felt KFC was more of my thing... But if I did feel the need for a burger I'd always go to Wendy's (Yes, there is one near me in the UK :eek: )


But... this certainly does look interesting, and LOL at the Cover Art.
Quote this post