Film Specs

  • Certificate:
    PG
  • Running Time:
    105 minutes
  • Released:
    2004
  • Country:
    United States of America
  • Director:
    Andrew Adamson, Kelly Asbury, Conrad Vernon
  • Starring:
    The voice talents of:
    Mike Myers
    Eddie Murphy
    Cameron Diaz
    Antonio Banderas
    John Cleese
    Julie Andrews
    Rupert Everett
    Jennifer Saunders
    Larry King
    Conrad Vernon
  • Genre(s):

    Animated
    Blockbuster

Shrek 2

20-05-2004 00:30 | 21478 views  |  Tiffany Bradford  |  Show Backlinks  |  Other "Shrek 2" Content

Shrek 2 begins where the first Shrek left off. Prince Charming finally arrives to save Princess Fiona from the dragon, only to discover she has already been saved by the giant green ogre and after a fairy-tale marriage they are away on their honeymoon. But the honeymoon is over all too quickly for Shrek and his new bride as they return to the swamp to find Donkey (who's having relationship problems with his fire-breathing girlfriend) has taken up residence in their home. If that's not bad enough, they receive a royal summons from the Princess's parents who want to welcome the new groom into the family and give the happy couple their marital blessing with a celebratory ball.



After some discussion and over Shrek's objections, the newlyweds and Donkey embark on a long journey to the royal castle in the land of Far Far Away. Once the trio arrives at the Kingdom, the King and Queen are shocked to discover their once-beautiful Princess has not only married an ogre (they were expecting the vainglorious Prince Charming), but has become one herself. The King and Shrek take an immediate dislike to one another and with the help of Prince Charming's scheming mother (the Fairy Godmother), King Harold plots to remove him from his daughter's life. A swashbuckling feline assassin (Puss-in-Boots) is hired to kill Shrek, but when the assassination attempt fails, he becomes an unlikely new companion to Shrek and Donkey and the three of them set out to discover the reason behind the hit on Shrek's life.



DreamWorks Studios proves once again it has the Midas touch with the eagerly-anticipated Shrek 2. Reuniting the voice talents of Myers, Diaz and Murphy from the first film, the directing team of Andrew Adamson, Kelly Asbury and Conrad Vernon have created a wickedly funny sequel with great new characters and a lot of heart. Brilliant sight gags and nods to pop culture abound and everything from Mission Impossible to Flashdance are parodied. The honeymoon montage spoofs Lord of the Rings, From Here to Eternity, and Spider-Man and one of the funniest scenes in the film is a parody called Knights which pokes fun at the reality police show Cops. Even Joan Rivers gets into the act when she critiques the fashion on display in a red carpet segment at the matrimonial ball. The Kingdom of Far Far Away is a medieval send-up of Beverly Hills, complete with palm trees and Farbucks coffee shoppes and skewers American consumerism - loyal subjects can fulfill all their shopping needs at places called Saxxon Fifth Avenue, Pewtery Barn, Versarchery and Old Knavery and you can buy a pint at the Poison Apple Inn where one of Cinderella's ugly stepsisters tends bar and Captain Hook sings Tom Waits songs. The look of the film is amazing as the computer-generated technology has improved greatly since the original Shrek was released - the facial expressions and shoulder movements are more life-like and fluid and the colour-palette is just dazzling. The soundtrack is an eclectic mix that runs the gamut from Tom Waits and Nick Cave to Counting Crowes and Ricky Martin song parodies.



Mike Myers (Shrek), Cameron Diaz (Princess Fiona) and Eddie Murphy (Donkey) all reprise their voice roles from the first film, along with new characters Puss-in-Boots (Antonio Banderas), Princess Fiona's parents the King (John Cleese) and Queen (Julie Andrews) of the Kingdom of Far Far Away, Prince Charming (Rupert Everett) and his mother the Fairy Godmother (Jennifer Saunders) and a bit of inspired casting with Larry King giving a transgendered voice performance as one of Cinderella's ugly stepsisters. The affectionate bickering between Shrek and Donkey picks up right where it left off in the first film and the wisecracking Donkey is as annoyingly verbose as ever. Jennifer Saunders' (Absolutely Fabulous) Fairy Godmother adds a bit of sauciness as the doting mother from Hell who will stop at nothing to put her son Prince Charming back into the arms of the Princess and in line for the throne, but it's Banderas' tabby in thigh-high boots who steals the show. The suave, Spanish-accented feline has some of the film's best lines and his sad kitty facial expressions will melt your heart.



After the enormous success of the original Shrek (which won the first Oscar ever for a full-length animated feature, grossed over 481 million dollars worldwide and set the bar on computer-generated films), the filmmakers knew they had their work cut out for them. By re-assembling the outstanding voice cast from the original, adding some brilliant new characters to the mix and bombarding scene-after-scene with hilarious sight gags and pop culture nods, Shrek 2 is equal to, if not better than the original. What it lacks in originality, it more than makes up for in humour and you'll be hard-pressed to find a better family film. In a Summer of hit-and-miss Blockbusters, Shrek and company reign supreme.

DVD Times Ratings

  • Overall: 
    8
    8 out of 10

Reader Ratings

  • Overall: 
    8.8

Comments

#1 Posted: 20-05-2004 00:53
Hernster
Big Member
Posts: 32

Report this post
I wasn't so sure about a sequel, but I am now. :)

What time does your flight get here tomorrow Tiffany? :)
Quote this post
#2 Posted: 20-05-2004 01:34
Kryten
Forum Moderator
Posts: 104

Report this post
Ok, just watched this, superb. 10/10. So much going on, unbelievably good animation, extremely funny characters and story, and lots of great parodies on other movies and stories again :) As well as lots more "adult" humour :D
------

Moderator @ The DVD Forums

Quote this post
#3 Posted: 20-05-2004 10:14
chimera01
Member
Posts: 218

Report this post
Yep the countdown has started, we shall visit the cinema as soon as possible.:cool: :cool:
Quote this post
#4 Posted: 20-05-2004 11:25
Silver_Liner
Member
Posts: 2

Report this post
Great review, can't wait to see this :)
Quote this post
#5 Posted: 20-05-2004 11:53
cyrano
Member
Posts: 1

Report this post
Can't wait.
How long before dvd threads asking when released :D
Quote this post
#6 Posted: 20-05-2004 13:25
liverpool fan
Account Disabled
Posts: 41

Report this post
the first one was ridiculous. it was slagging disney all the way through (which is fair enough) and then at the end it had the most sappy uber-disney ending ever.
Quote this post
#7 Posted: 20-05-2004 15:47
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
I really disliked what I saw of the first film, and I also thought its visuals were quite poor: very bad colour styling, animation didn't feel like it adhered properly to gravity and the weight of the characters. So the animation side of things has been improved for the sequel? (I'm not holding much hope for the story, since the first one wasn't my cup of tea at all.)
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#8 Posted: 20-05-2004 17:59
Richard Booth
Contributor & Filmmaker
Posts: 980

Report this post
Great review Tiffany, as ever - another great DVD Times scoop. :)

Mike - I think this is styled very much like the original, from what I've read, so perhaps this also won't be your cup of tea.
------
We do not tell time, time only tells us.
Quote this post
#9 Posted: 20-05-2004 18:58
K
das contributor
Posts: 918

Report this post
I was dissapointed with the first movie. It wasn't as hilarious as it was made out to be, merely a few chuckles and I agree about the animation style. I just didn't take too well to the overall grotesque look of the characters that didn't feel right.
------

www.koreancinemahouse.co.uk

Quote this post
#10 Posted: 20-05-2004 21:00
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
My biggest problem was the design of the princess. Clearly an attempt to be realistic, it came across as grotesque more than anything (as 3D attempting to be realistic almost invariably does). At least it looks like she's not in her "human" form in the sequel. :D
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#11 Posted: 20-05-2004 21:27
K
das contributor
Posts: 918

Report this post
Yea that's exactly what I mean. I found the humans to be just as strange looking than the other characters. And yet in the making of feature, the animators go on about how realistic they are.
------

www.koreancinemahouse.co.uk

Quote this post
#12 Posted: 21-05-2004 07:36
portingaleo
Member
Posts: 1

Report this post
Great review! Its got me even more excited.
You could watch the first five minutes on the official website. Extremely funny. It looks like they've unfortunately removed it from the site now though.
Quote this post
#13 Posted: 21-05-2004 21:33
tokyomonkey
Member
Posts: 273

Report this post
Speaking as an animator,I thought the first film was awful-Gaudy,over rendered dross with absolutely nothing to say and a horrible MOR rock score,and it would appear Shrek 2 has gone even more overboard with the pop culture references..Disney's Aladdin has a lot to answer for when it comes to this sort of thing.All a matter of taste of course,but I'll stick with the Japanese (and occasional one off like 'Belleville Rendezvous') for inspiring animation and let the US lead the way technologically if not artistically
Quote this post
#14 Posted: 22-05-2004 12:13
Joe B
Member
Posts: 13

Report this post
I have to go along with the naysayers on this one...
Quote this post
#15 Posted: 23-05-2004 20:57
stigdu
Horror fan
Posts: 13

Report this post
Thought the first film was pretty good, if nothing spectacular. Doubt this'll be a cinema trip for me - more like a DVD rental....
Quote this post
#16 Posted: 23-05-2004 21:24
magnetic
GoldMember
Posts: 164

Report this post
the highlight of the first was the 'rendition' of Baby got back by the donkey at the end - and thats not saying much, but i thought it was cool. The first 5 minutes of shrek 2 on the official site looked promising when it had the LoTR reference, well we'll see i guess.
------
Fail To Prepare - Prepare To Fail
Quote this post
#17 Posted: 24-05-2004 20:23
emccusker
Account Disabled
Posts: 75

Report this post
Tiffany - As always, an excellent review but I'm with most here in that I never thought the original to be worthy of the praise it was given. And better than Monsters Inc.? Don't think so...

...except for the executioner 'cos he was great and worthy of a whole film on his own. Please tell me he's in the sequel!
Quote this post
#18 Posted: 26-05-2004 14:14
ryonhill
Member
Posts: 118

Report this post
The trailer is great, plenty of jokes and im really looking forward to this.
Quote this post
#19 Posted: 26-05-2004 14:41
phaideaux2000
Spel chequer
Posts: 332

Report this post
The animators on Shrek never said their human characters were realistic....they actually said they were 'in danger of becoming too realistic' and so a more cartoony finish was adopted. To criticise a film like this of being too gaudy seems churlish, and to say it is better or worse than Monsters Inc depends on your sense of humour. I loved the first Shrek - thought its animation was incredibly well observed (its a cartoon remember, not a Final Fantasy wannabee) and its cinematic visual style was spot on - looking forward to the sequel but thought Monsters Inc was nice to look at but not as funny and a bit too sickly sweet.
------
Quote this post
#20 Posted: 26-05-2004 14:53
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
Quote:
The animators on Shrek never said their human characters were realistic


No, but it certainly looks like that was what they were trying to do, especially in terms of character design, where the princess looks like a bad attempt at mimicking real life. I agree with what Tokyomonkey said about it being "over-rendered".
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#21 Posted: 26-05-2004 14:55
phaideaux2000
Spel chequer
Posts: 332

Report this post
No - they were trying to refrain from being too realistic - their words.
Like I said - its a cartoon. The character models work fine in that 'altered reality' respect. After all, would we criticise Tom & Jerry for walking on 2 legs? ;)
------
Quote this post
#22 Posted: 26-05-2004 15:28
magnetic
GoldMember
Posts: 164

Report this post
dont bring tom and jerry into this!!!
------
Fail To Prepare - Prepare To Fail
Quote this post
#23 Posted: 27-05-2004 21:42
Michael Mackenzie
Contributor
Posts: 1651

Report this post
Quote:
No - they were trying to refrain from being too realistic - their words.


They didn't succeed then.
------

Reviews | DVDs | My Web Site

Quote this post
#24 Posted: 27-05-2004 23:33
Tiffany Bradford
DVD Times Princess
Posts: 92

Report this post
"except for the executioner 'cos he was great and worthy of a whole film on his own"

I loved Thelonious - Got Milk? :p

And I never said it was better than Monsters, Inc. The scene with Sully and Boo still makes me cry :(, but I did enjoy the Shrek films more because I adore the humour and being from California, the Beverly Hills send-up in Shrek 2 is spot on :D

I appreciate all the comments guys, especially the animation debate.
------
My Top 20 Films
Quote this post
#25 Posted: 28-05-2004 12:29
emccusker
Account Disabled
Posts: 75

Report this post
No, and in coming clean, it was the Oscars who said that Shrek was better than Monsters, Inc. 'Nonsense' is the verdict on that by me, my daughter and this other person I know...which counts.

*Holds two fingers up* Number three, m'lord, uh, three, etc.
Quote this post

Page: 1, 2